Those fourteen notes are some of the most distinctive (when played at even rhythm, at least - all quarter notes. The first seven notes, maybe, but the next seven notes too? No way. I always said to myself it couldn't be a coincidence. Can anyone who owns the soundtrack or has the movie verify? - Ouzo 21:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC) Yeah I noticed it too.

Cbrown1023 02:26, 18 September 2006 (UTC) John Williams & 'When You Wish Upon A Star' ДЄt about 4:30 of the theme to Close Encounters of the Third Kind by John Williams there is a familiar sounding music piece which sounds like the opening to When You Wish Upon A Star. Britannica 01:32, 5 June 2006 (UTC) Plot This info is summarized on the Bill Peet page. It's been years since I read it but if anyone owns it, Bill Peet's autobiography would make a great source. Should this be included in the article? I would think so. Eventually these segments were torn off the storyboards by Walt Disney in one of his furious rages and they never appeared in the final product. He (or someone he knew) also helped animate the scene where Geppetto et al are swallowed by Monstro. Peet was hired to work on the movie for his creative submissions of creatures to populate 'Monster Island,' and when he got to work he worked on the Monster Island segment. In Bill Peet's great autobiography, which provides many insights into the early years at the Disney studios, the author goes into a lot of detail about the making of Pinocchio, as that was the first movie he had a significant role in, and it seems there was indeed a film in the making very different from the one that turned out. talk 11:16, 2 June 2006 (UTC) Early version.This is not an excercise is writing as little as possible to justify the images, but using as few (copyright) images as possible to illustrate the article. talk 19:56, (UTC) ' As seen below the poster used to advertise and promote the film have changed significantly over the years.' is not a significnat part of the text, and definitely not worthy of 16 images.Yes, one can infer a point about the evolution of the poster from them, but such a point is never discussed, and definitely not at a significant enough length that would justify fair use under out image policies. Unfortunately not, images can't justify themselves. Stop removing valid material that would stand up in a court of law!- Nick Dillinger 12:07, (UTC) Garion96 (talk) 20:04, (UTC) The artwork is critically analyzed by it's inclusion in the gallery. That it was in a gallery just made it more stand out to me. But there was no talk about all the other images. One image is indeed to illustrate the move in question. Fair use is allowed 'to illustrate the movie in question or to provide critical analysis of the poster content or artwork'.

I assume it's not the fact that it's a gallery that invalidates fair use, but rather the images themselves, right? Powers 19:51, (UTC) Yes. Garion96 (talk) 19:48, (UTC) I made it a gallery because it looked like crap before doing so. But instead of reverting each other I will ask a second opinion. I am pretty sure a fair use gallery is not allowed on wikipedia. Imdwalrus 20:02, 25 August 2005 (UTC) Fair use gallery Is this second paragraph really needed? It seems like more of a review than anything useful. References to use Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article.

13 Differences between the movie and the original short stories?.

12 Pinocchio related articles need 'infoboxes'.

6 John Williams & 'When You Wish Upon A Star'.

Wish upon a star movie plot